Dismissed

Dharmendra Rai @ Dharmendra Kumar Rai v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC11 Sept 2023CR. MISC./5674/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court rejected the petition for bail filed by an accused charged with rape and other offences under IPC. Upholding the prosecution's version, the Court refused bail and directed the trial court to expedite proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for grant of bail was rejected; the Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same at the earliest.

Dharmendra Rai @ Dharmendra Kumar Rai Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5674 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-181 Year-2022 Thana- PRANPUR District- Katihar

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Dharmendra Rai @ Dharmendra Kumar Rai, son of Parmeshwar Rai, resident of Village-Budhaili, P.S.-Pranpur, District-Katihar

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjeev Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Md. Aslam Ansari

¶7

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶8

4 11-09-2023

¶9

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶10

learned A.P.P appearing on behalf of the State.

¶11

The petitioner is languishing in custody in a

¶12

case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 376, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

It is alleged that while the informant was sleeping with her children in the night, this petitioner broke the gate of the house and forcefully committed rape upon her and threatened of dire consequences, if

¶14

she discloses the incidence to anyone.

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5674 of 2023(4) dt.11-09-2023 2/3

¶16

It is submitted by learned counsel for the

¶17

petitioner that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. The victim is married lady and the doctor has not found recent sexual assault upon the informant. There is no eye witness to the occurrence. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 22.08.2022. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

¶18

In contra, learned A.P.P appearing on behalf of the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submitted that the specific accusation of committing wrong is against the petitioner and the victim in her 164 Cr.P.C statement has also specifically alleged against the petitioner that he forcefully committed rape upon her.

¶19

Considering the fact that thrust of accusation is against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶20

The prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5674 of 2023(4) dt.11-09-2023 3/3

¶22

stands rejected.

¶23

The Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial

¶24

and conclude the same at the earliest.

¶25

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶26

Shageer/-

¶27

U T

Dharmendra Rai @ Dharmendra Kumar Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dharmendra Rai @ Dharmendra Kumar Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suraj Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Dilip Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Rohit Kumar @ Golu Vs The State of Bihar

Lala Rajbanshi Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Ram @ Vikash Rai Vs the State of Bihar

Ajay Mandal Vs The State of Bihar