Allowed

Lala Rajbanshi v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC11 Sept 2023CR. MISC./10548/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous petition concerning murder charges under IPC 304(B), the Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner, the husband of the deceased, after he remained in custody since late 2021. The court fixed bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for bail allowed; petitioner released on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of similar amount.

Lala Rajbanshi Vs The State of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10548 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-138 Year-2020 Thana- DAUDNAGAR District- Aurangabad

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Lala Rajbanshi Son Of Ganauri Rajbanshi R/O Vill.- Arai, P.S.- Daudnagar, Distt.- Aurangabad

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anil Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shahabuddin Azeem @ S. Azeem ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

4 11-09-2023

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶12

learned A.P.P for the State.

¶13

The petitioner is languishing in custody in a

¶14

case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

It is a case of commission of murder of the

¶16

daughter of the informant by all her in-laws family members including the petitioner.

¶17

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely

¶18

been implicated in this case. The petitioner is husband of the deceased. There is no prior complaint regarding

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10548 of 2023(4) dt.11-09-2023 2/3

¶20

dowry, torture, harassment against the petitioner. For the alleged occurrence of 15.05.2020, the F.I.R was registered on 23.05.2020 without explaining the delay. The deceased was ill and the informant was informed about the death of the deceased and the informant and others participated in the funeral and thereafter this false case has been registered against the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 27.10.2021. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has clean antecedent.

¶21

Learned A.P.P appearing on behalf of the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submitted that petitioner is husband of the deceased and he was fully responsible for commission of murder of the deceased.

¶22

Considering the facts aforesaid and the period under custody, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10548 of 2023(4) dt.11-09-2023 3/3

¶24

to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial

¶25

Magistrate, Daudnagar, Aurangabad in connection with

¶26

Daudnagar P.S. Case No. 138 of 2020.

¶27

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶28

Shageer/-

¶29

U T

Lala Rajbanshi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Lala Rajbanshi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suraj Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Dilip Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Rohit Kumar @ Golu Vs The State of Bihar

Vikash Ram @ Vikash Rai Vs the State of Bihar

Dharmendra Rai @ Dharmendra Kumar Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Ajay Mandal Vs The State of Bihar