Allowed

Anil Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC3 Aug 2023CR. MISC./38710/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an anticipatory bail petition, the Patna High Court directed the petitioner's release on bail after four weeks by furnishing a bond with two sureties, subject to statutory conditions, noting the petitioner's clean antecedents and lack of evidence against him regarding the alleged kidnapping.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail within four weeks by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.

Anil Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.38710 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-79 Year-2018 Thana- ALOULI District- Khagaria

¶3

======================================================

¶4

ANIL KUMAR SON OF SURESH PRASAD YADAV, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - BARTAR, P.S. - ALAULI, DISTRICT – KHAGARIA.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR.

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Raj Kishor Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Sucheta Yadav ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 03-08-2023

¶13

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶14

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Alauli P.S. Case No. 79 of 2018 (G.R. No. 643 of 2018), registered for offence punishable under section 363 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

As per allegation, Amol Kumar had kidnapped the grand-daughter of the informant and the allegation against other named accused persons, including the petitioner, is that they had assisted the main accused Amol Kumar in kidnapping the grand-daughter of the informant.

¶16

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.38710 of 2023(3) dt.03-08-2023 2/2

¶18

this case. He is a person of clean antecedent. The accusation of kidnapping the grand-daughter of the informant is against Amol Kumar, not against the petitioner. Nothing emerged during course of investigation against this petitioner and accordingly the police submitted final form against him.

¶19

Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender, within four weeks from today, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in connection with Alauli P.S. Case No. 79 of 2018 (G.R. No. 643 of 2018), subject to condition as laid down under section 438(2) Cr. P.C.

¶20

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

¶21

Mahesh/-

¶22

U T

Anil Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nagina Prasad Vs Surati Devi

Tapeshwar Singh @ Tapeshwar Singh Bhogta Vs The State of Bihar

Kailash Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Pawan Paswan @ Pawan Kumar Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Baban Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Vishwanath Pandey @ Vishwanath Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar