Allowed

Tapeshwar Singh @ Tapeshwar Singh Bhogta v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC2 Aug 2023CR. MISC./39956/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court, in a special bail application, granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, a farmer accused of opium cultivation on forest land under the NDPS Act. The Court directed his release upon surrender or arrest within four weeks after furnishing a bond.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of Rs. 10,000 each to the Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge NDPS Act, Gaya.

Tapeshwar Singh @ Tapeshwar Singh Bhogta Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2023)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39956 of 2023

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-137 Year-2022 Thana- BARACHATTI District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

TAPESHWAR SINGH @ TAPESHWAR SINGH BHOGTA Son of Nemdhari Singh Resident of village - Khajurian, P.S. - Barachatti, Distt. - Gaya

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sudhir Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Mohammad Sufyan

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY

¶13

ORAL ORDER

¶14

2 02-08-2023

¶15

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶16

learned APP for the State.

¶17

The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 8(B)/18/19 of the NDPS Act, 1985, registered in connection with Barachatti P.S.Case No. 137 of 2022.

¶18

As per allegation, the petitioner was involved in cultivation of opium crops on the forest land.

¶19

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that he is a person of clean antecedent and has falsely been implicated in this case and the land on which there is allegation of cultivation of opium crops, does not belong to the petitioner.

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39956 of 2023(2) dt.02-08-2023 2/2

¶21

Considering the above facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within four weeks from the date of communication of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge (NDPS Act) Gaya, in connection with Barachatti P.S.Case No. 137 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C.

¶22

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

¶23

HR/-

¶24

U T

Tapeshwar Singh @ Tapeshwar Singh Bhogta v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Tapeshwar Singh @ Tapeshwar Singh Bhogta v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dilip Pandit @ Dilip Kumar Pandit Vs The State of Bihar

Malti Kumari Vs The State of Bihar through the Police Inspector, Vigilance Department, Bihar, Patna

Om Prakash Vs The State of Bihar

Nagina Prasad Vs Surati Devi

Kailash Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Khushi Kumari @ Khusboo Kumari Vs The State of Bihar