Nagina Prasad v. Surati Devi
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge allowed an oral application for restoration of Civil Miscellaneous Jurisdiction No. 159 of 2021 to its original file and number in compliance with a prior order.
What did the court decide?
Civil Miscellaneous Jurisdiction No. 159 of 2021 is restored to its original file and number.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.426 of 2023
In
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.159 of 2021
======================================================
Nagina Prasad Son of Feknarayan Singh @ Feku Singh, Resident of VillageTek Bigha, P.O.- Kapsiyawan, Police Station- Hilsa, District- Nalanda at present Bus Stand Patel Nagar Hilsa, P.O. and Police Station- Hilsa, DistrictNalanda.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
- Surati Devi Wife of Late Ramsharan Singh, Resident of Village Tek Bigha, P.o. Kapsiyawan P.S. Hilsa, District- Nalanda, at present Bus Stand Patel Nagar Hilsa, P.O. and P.S. Hilsa, District- Nalanda.
- Birendra Kumar Son of Late Ramsharan Singh, Resident of Village Tek Bigha, P.o. Kapsiyawan P.S. Hilsa, District- Nalanda, at present Bus Stand Patel Nagar Hilsa, P.O. and P.S. Hilsa, District- Nalanda.
- Pranendra Kumar Son of Late Ramsaran Singh, Resident of Village Tek Bigha, P.o. Kapsiyawan P.S. Hilsa, District- Nalanda, at present Bus Stand Patel Nagar Hilsa, P.O. and P.S. Hilsa, District- Nalanda.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Nagina Prasad
- respondent
Surati Devi
- respondent
Birendra Kumar
- respondent
Pranendra Kumar
- respondent
Pallawi Viswash
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court