Anil Kumar Pandey v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court dismissed a Civil Writ petition as infructuous due to events subsequent to filing, decided as an oral order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9453 of 2020
======================================================
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms.Shruti Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Manish Kumar, G.P.-4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER
Counsel for the petitioners submits that this application has become infructuous due to events subsequent to filing of this case.
The application is dismissed as infructuous.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
PNM
U
Anil Kumar Pandey and others
State of Bihar and others
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court