Petitioner's civil writ petition was dismissed as infructuous. No substantive legal reasoning or grounds were provided beyond the counsel's submission.
The application was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20825 of 2018
======================================================
Anju Devi W/o Vijay Yadav, R/v- Dhoi Kalyana, P.S. Sadar, DistrictDarbhanga.
... ... Petitioner
... ... Respondents
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Kumar, Adv. For the State : Mr. Sushil Kumar, GP-22
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER
The matter has been listed upon a motion slip being
filed by the petitioner’s counsel.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the
application has become infructuous.
The same is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
shyambihari/-
U
Anju Devi W/o Vijay Yadav
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar
The District Magistrate-cum- Chairman, District Compassionate Appointment Committee, Darbhanga
The Superintending Engineer, Road Construction Department, Road Circle, Darbhanga
The Executive Engineer, Road Constructions Department, Road Division, Darbhanga
Sanju Devi, W/o- Ram Bilash Yadav
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
