Disposed

Sanjeev Prasad, v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC15 Jul 2022CWJC/3821/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A writ petition seeking liberty to pursue a regularization claim was disposed of without adjudication on the merits, directing the petitioner to proceed before the Executive Director cum Special Secretary of the State Health Society.

What did the court decide?

The writ application was disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to pursue his claim for regularization based on application dated 20-07-2020.

Sanjeev Prasad, Vs The State of Bihar — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3821 of 2022

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Sanjeev Prasad, aged about 43 years (Male) son of Jai Nandan Prasad, resident of Pakari, Arrah, Bhojpur, Arrah, P.O. and P.S.-Pakri, P.S.-Nawada and District- Bojpur-802301.

¶4

... ... Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Health Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶7

The State Health Society Bihar through its Administrative Officer, State Kalyan Bhawan, Sheikhpura.

¶8

The Secretary, Health cum Chief Executive Officer, State Health Society, Bihar, Kalyan Bhawan, Sheikhpura.

¶9

The Executive Director cum Special Secretary, Health, State Health Society, Bihar.

¶10

The Civil Surgeon-cum-Member Secretary, District Health Society.

¶11

... ... Respondents

¶12

======================================================

¶13

Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Pranav Kumar, Adv. For the State : Mr. Ramadhar Singh, GP-25 For the State Health Society : Mr. Kishore Kumar Sinha, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶14

2 15-07-2022

¶15

The matter has been taken up for consideration online.

¶16

Today, the matter has been listed under the heading

¶17

“To Be Mentioned”.

¶18

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the State and learned counsel representing the State Health Society through virtual mode.

¶19

The matter was mentioned and slip was filed by the petitioner for disposal of the matter, with liberty to the petitioner to pursue his claim for regularization arising out of Annexure-

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.3821 of 2022(2) dt.15-07-2022 2/2

¶21

13, the application dated 20-07-2020, before the Executive Director-cum- Special Secretary, Health, State Health Society, Bihar (Respondent No.4).

¶22

Accordingly, the matter has been listed today.

¶23

As prayed by petitioner’s counsel the writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to pursue his claim for regularization based on application dated 20-07-2020 before the Executive Director-cum- Special Secretary, Health, State Health Society, Bihar (Respondent No.4)

¶24

Writ application is, accordingly, disposed of.

¶25

(Madhuresh Prasad, J)

¶26

shyambihari/-

¶27

Sanjeev Prasad, v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjeev Prasad, v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anamika Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Radha Rani Gupta, Vs The State of Bihar

Mohan Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Anju Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Amresh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Anil Kumar Pandey Vs The State of Bihar