In a writ petition, the petitioner claimed the application became infructuous due to post-filing events. The court dismissed the application on these grounds without resolving substantive claims.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.780 of 2020
======================================================
Bikash Kumar Pandey, S/o Dharmraj Pandey, R/o Ward No. 2, Near Talab Sarangpur, P.S.-Kochas, District-Kaimur (Bhabhua).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kumar Rahi For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ravi Ranjan, AC to SC-2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER
affidavit, which is being taken on record.
Petitioner’s counsel submits that in view of the events subsequent to the filing of writ petition and during pendency of
the same, the application has become infructuous.
Application is accordingly dismissed.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
SUMIT/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's application has become infructuous due to subsequent events?
Bikash Kumar Pandey
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
The Principal Secretary, Department of Finance, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
The Joint Secretary, Department of Finance, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
The Secretary (Resource/expenditure), Finance Department, Bihar
The Additional Chief Secretary, General Administration Department, Bihar, Patna
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
