This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19 of 2018
======================================================
Anil Kumar Son of- Late Surendra Prasad, Resident of Village P.O.- Ranipur, P.S.- Islampur, District- Nalanda, at Present Deputy Agriculture DirectorCum- Joint Controller Weight and Measure, Patna Bailey Road, Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Santosh Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Chittranjan Sinha PAAG2 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER
5 18-07-2022 Petitioner’s counsel submits that in view of the events
subsequent to the filing of writ petition and during pendency of the same, the application has become infructuous.
Application is accordingly dismissed.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
SUMIT/-
U
Anil Kumar
The State Of Bihar
The Director Agriculture Government of Bihar
The Additional Secretary Agriculture Department Government of Bihar
Sri Aditya Narayan Rai
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
