Oral order dismissing a writ application for want of prosecution on the grounds that the petitioner's counsel failed to appear and no supplementary affidavit was filed after repeated adjournments granted as indulgences.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.316 of 2020
======================================================
Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Kumar Sah Son of Phuchay Sah @ Fuchay Sah Resident of Village- Sisia, P.O.- Sisia, P.S.- Korha, District- Katihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Md. Majid Mahboob Khan, AC to AAG-12 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER
5 27-07-2022 On 28.06.2022, time was sought for filling supplementary affidavit on behalf of the petitioner. Thereafter, the matter was adjourned to 12.07.2022, when by way of last indulgence case was again adjourned. On 13.07.2022, petitioner’s counsel again prayed and was granted two weeks’ time for filing supplementary affidavit by way of last indulgence. Today, when the matter is taken up, none appears on behalf of the petitioner.
Application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
SUMIT/-
U
Sunil Kumar @ Sunil Kumar Sah
The State of Bihar
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
