Anil Kumar Sinha v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Thumbprint removed. The petition was permitted to avail remedy under Rule 24(2) of CCA Rules 2005. Writ petition disposed with liberty so to do.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.83 of 2018
======================================================
Anil Kumar Sinha Son of Sri Mahendra Prasad Sinha, Resident of Flat No. 401, Yogendra Parwati Enclave, 36 Kidwaipuri, P.S. Kotwali, District-Patna.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
... ... Respondents
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Adv. For the State : Mr. H. S. Roy AC to AG For the BPSC : Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Adv. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER
the remedy under Rule 24(2) of the CCA Rules, 2005.
With liberty as aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed
of.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
shyambihari/-
U
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Anil Kumar Sinha
The State of Bihar
The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
The Principal Secretary, Excise Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
The Special Secretary, Excise Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
The Department Inquiry Commissioner, Bihar, Patna
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court