This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.238 of 2018
======================================================
Manti Kumari @ Malti Devi, Daughter of Late Jamuna @ Jamuna Manjhi, Resident of Mohalla- Beur Musahari, P.O.- Anisabad, P.S.- Beur, DistrictPatna.
... ... Petitioner/s
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vijay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Prasoon Sinha, Advocate ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER
9 15-09-2022
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondent-Corporation.
The parties are ad idem on the issue that the prayer made in the writ application has become infructuous. The same is, accordingly, dismissed.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
PNM
U
Manti Kumari @ Malti Devi
The Patna Municipal Corporation
MADHURESH PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
