Petitioner withdrew the writ application during hearing; High Court dismissed the application as withdrawn.
Writ application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11450 of 2021
======================================================
Vinay Urano @ Vinay Urav (Male), aged about 39 years, son of Juglal Urav resident of village-Semra Manderwal, Police Station- Semra, District- West Champaran (Bettiah).
... ... Petitioner
Versus
... ... Respondents
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Lokesh Kumar Singh, Adv. For the UOI : Mr. Abhay Shankar Jha, CGC ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER
counsel representing the Union of India.
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not wish to press this writ application.
Accordingly, the writ application is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
shyambihari/-
U
Vinay Urano @ Vinay Urav
The Union of India
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
