Arvind Kumar v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 2506 of 2020
======================================================
Arvind Kumar Son of Arun Kumar Mahto R/o- Mohalla- Senapath, P.O.- Lal Bagh, District- Darbhanga.
... ... Petitioner/s
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr Binod Kumar, Advocate For the High Court : Mr Satyabir Bharti, Advocate For the State : Mr Gyan Prakash Ojha, GA VII Mr Uday Shankar Pandey, AC to GA VII
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD
ORAL ORDER
2 14-09-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be pursuing his representation (Annexure 6)
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondents 2 to 5 submits that the writ petition is barred by delay and laches.
Without expressing any opinion on merits of either of the submissions, this writ petition is disposed of.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
M.E.H. /-
U
Arvind Kumar Son of Arun Kumar Mahto
The State of Bihar through its Law Secretary
The Convener Co-ordination Committee-cum- District and Sessions Judge, Patna
The District and Sessions Judge, Samastipur
The Registrar Civil Courts, Samastipur
The Registrar General Patna High Court of Judicature at Patna
Madhuresh Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court