Allowed

Jitendra Chauhan v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC4 Nov 2022CR. MISC./9835/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, Jitendra Chauhan, apprehending arrest in a case FIR 81/2021 under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act. The petitioner alleged false implication without recovery of incriminating articles. Bail was granted with conditions within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted with bond of Rs. 10,000/- and two sureties of like amount within four weeks.

Jitendra Chauhan Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9835 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-81 Year-2021 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Nawada

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Jitendra Chauhan S/O Raghni Chauhan Resident Of Village- Milki Baldariya, P.S.- Warisaliganj, District- Nawada

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 04-11-2022

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

APP for the State.

¶13

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act.

¶14

Allegedly, it is a case of recovery of illicit liquor from a canal of Milki Beldariya village.

¶15

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that he has no concern with the seized liquor and no incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and petitioner has not been apprehended at the spot.

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9835 of 2022(3) dt.04-11-2022 2/2

¶17

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶18

Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioner, above named in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Nawada, in connection with G.O. Case No. 81 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶19

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶20

Brajesh Kumar/-

¶21

U T

Jitendra Chauhan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jitendra Chauhan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Santosh Yadav @ Santosh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Nagendra Tiwari@Wagad Tiwari Vs The State of Bihar

Chandan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Birbal Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Satyendra Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Dharmendra Yadav @ Hanuman Yadav Vs The State of Bihar