Allowed

Birbal Rai v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC4 Nov 2022CR. MISC./10082/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar granted anticipatory bail to Usha Devi, wife of Birbal Rai, in an illicit liquor recovery case under the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act. She is to surrender and be released on bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to surrender and be released on anticipatory bail of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties within four weeks subject to Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. conditions.

Birbal Rai Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10082 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-221 Year-2021 Thana- RAGHUNATHPUR District- Siwan

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Birbal Rai Son Of Late Dhela Rai R/O - Manrauli, P.S.- Raghunathpur, District- Siwan

¶5

Usha Devi Wife Of Birbal Rai R/O - Manrauli, P.S.- Raghunathpur, DistrictSiwan

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Asha Kumari, APP ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 04-11-2022 Vide order dated 13.09.2022, the bail prayer of petitioner no.1 has already been dismissed as withdrawn.

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner no.2 and learned APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner no.2 is apprehending her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016.

¶15

Allegedly, it is a case of recovery of illicit liquor from petitioner no.1 who was apprehended by the police.

¶16

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner no.2 that the petitioner no.2 has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that she has no concern with the seized

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10082 of 2022(3) dt.04-11-2022 2/2

¶18

liquor and no incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and petitioner no.2 has not been apprehended at the spot. Petitioner no.2 has clean antecedent.

¶19

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioner no.2, namely, Usha Devi, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special (Excise), Siwan in connection with Raghunathpur P.S. Case No. 221 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶21

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶22

Brajesh Kumar/- U T

Birbal Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Birbal Rai v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Santosh Yadav @ Santosh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Nagendra Tiwari@Wagad Tiwari Vs The State of Bihar

Chandan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Jitendra Chauhan Vs The State of Bihar

Satyendra Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Dharmendra Yadav @ Hanuman Yadav Vs The State of Bihar