Allowed

Santosh Yadav @ Santosh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC3 Nov 2022CR. MISC./9913/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners in a dowry death case, permitting their release upon arrest or surrender within four weeks by furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two similar sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners allowed to release on ant. bail after arrest/surrender within 4 weeks on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties.

Santosh Yadav @ Santosh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9913 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-178 Year-2021 Thana- PARAIYA District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

1. Santosh Yadav @ Santosh Kumar W/O Binda Yadav R/O Village- Daguni Tola, Maharajganj, P.S.- Paraiya, District- Gaya

¶5

Rinku Devi W/o Santosh Yadav @ Santosh Kumar R/o village- Daguni Tola, Maharajganj, P.S.- Paraiya, District- Gaya

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Manish Kumar No2 For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nitya Nand Tiwary ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 03-11-2022

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

¶13

learned APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under

¶15

Sections 304(B), 201, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

The accusation is of killing the daughter of the

¶17

informant for non-fulfillment of dowry demand.

¶18

It is submitted by learned counsel for the

¶19

petitioners that petitioners are brother-in-law and sister-

¶20

in-law of the deceased. There is general and omnibus

¶21

allegation against the petitioners. The petitioners live

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9913 of 2022(3) dt.03-11-2022 2/2

¶23

separately from the husband of the deceased and they had no concern with the day-to-day affairs of the deceased and her husband.

¶24

In the facts and circumstance of the case, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest

¶25

or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousands)

¶26

each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1^st Class, Gaya in connection with Paraiya P.S. Case No. 178 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶27

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶28

Shageer/-

¶29

U T

Santosh Yadav @ Santosh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santosh Yadav @ Santosh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunil Kumar Rai @ Sunil Rai Vs the State of Bihar

Ankita Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Singh @ Amit Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Nagendra Tiwari@Wagad Tiwari Vs The State of Bihar

Chandan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rajesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar