Allowed

Dharmendra Yadav @ Hanuman Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC4 Nov 2022CR. MISC./10508/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order grants anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a liquor recovery case. The High Court directed his release on bail within four weeks of arrest or surrender, subject to meeting bond conditions under Section 438(2) CrPC.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted anticipatory bail; released on bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties within four weeks of arrest.

Dharmendra Yadav @ Hanuman Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10508 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-221 Year-2021 Thana- RAGHUNATHPUR District- Siwan

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Dharmendra Yadav @ Hanuman Yadav Son Of Late Munsi Yadav Resident Of Village - Raghunathpur, P.S. - Raghunathpur, District - Siwan.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Tiwary, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anant Kumar 1, APP ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 04-11-2022

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶12

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016.

¶13

Allegedly, it is a case of recovery of illicit liquor from two motorcycles.

¶14

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that he has no concern with the seized liquor and the vehicle and no incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner and petitioner has not been apprehended at the spot. Petitioner has clean antecedent.

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10508 of 2022(2) dt.04-11-2022 2/2

¶16

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶17

Considering the aforesaid submissions, let the petitioner, above named in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District and Sessions Judge-II-cum-special (Excise), Siwan in connection with Raghunathpur P.S. Case No. 221 of 2021, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶18

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

Dharmendra Yadav @ Hanuman Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dharmendra Yadav @ Hanuman Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Santosh Yadav @ Santosh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Nagendra Tiwari@Wagad Tiwari Vs The State of Bihar

Chandan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Jitendra Chauhan Vs The State of Bihar

Birbal Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Satyendra Singh Vs The State of Bihar