The Patna High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner, who was accused of murder, attempted murder, and robbery, directing him to furnish a bail bond with two sureties within four weeks.
Enlargement on bail upon furnishing bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of like amount each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48431 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-144 Year-2021 Thana- SAHEBPUR KAMAL District-
Begusarai
======================================================
MD. AKRAM S/o Md. Sultan Resident of Village- Lakhiminia, Baidabaag, P.S.- Ballia, District- Begusarai.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
2 08-12-2022
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sandip Kumar Gautam For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Pushpa Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER
... ... Opposite Party/s
Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to
remove defect (s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks on resumption of physical mode.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under sections 393, 397 and 307 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
As per the prosecution case, the informant alleges that while he along with his uncle was returning from a birth ceremony when they were intercepted by four criminals, who tried to commit robbery, but the informant tried to flee from the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48431 of 2022(2) dt.08-12-2022 2/3
place of occurrence when the criminals shot the uncle of the informant on his back from behind.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has sprung up in the confessional statement of the co-accused. The other co-accused persons have already been granted bail by the Co-ordinate Bench vide order dated 09.05.2022 and 22.08.2022 passed in Criminal Misc. No. 67127 of 2021and 24324 of 2022 respectively. The petitioner is accused in one other criminal case as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 19.07.2021.
Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of detention, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Begusarai in connection with Sahebpur Kamal P.S. Case No. 144 of 2021.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48431 of 2022(2) dt.08-12-2022 3/3
The application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)
atul/ayush-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether regular bail should be granted to the petitioner in a case involving murder, attempted murder, robbery, and unlawful possession of arms.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
MD. AKRAM
The State of Bihar
CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
