Dismissed

Mantu Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC16 Nov 2022CR. MISC./30455/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court rejected an application for regular bail in a murder and illegal arms case. The court rejected bail due to the severe specific allegation that the petitioner fired a weapon at a child's birthday party, resulting in the death of an 8-year-old boy.

What did the court decide?

The bail petition stands rejected. The trial is directed to be completed within 6 months.

Mantu Paswan Vs The State of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30455 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-77 Year-2021 Thana- NOORSARAI District- Nalanda

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MANTU PASWAN Son of Vijay Paswan Resident of Village - BansgoPalpur, P.s.- Noorsarai, Distt.- Nalanda.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shruti Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶8

ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 16-11-2022

¶10

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to

¶11

remove defect (s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks on resumption of physical mode.

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

A.P.P for the State.

¶14

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶15

As per the prosecution case, the petitioner was dancing and firing in the air during the occasion of a birthday party, which hit in the head of the informant's son and one splinter hit Abhishek Kumar. The informant's son was taken to the government hospital where he was declared dead.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30455 of 2022(2) dt.16-11-2022 2/2

¶18

case. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 07.03.2021.

¶19

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner by submitting that there is specific allegation against the petitioner of firing, on account of that firing a minor child aged about 8 years died. It has further been submitted that the act of firing using illegal arms at a child's birthday party, the consequence of which was well within the knowledge of the petitioner, has caused the death of a 8 year old innocent boy without any reason, which gets support from the materials available on record.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as specific allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge this petitioner above-named on bail.

¶21

Learned Trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same preferably within 6 months and report this Court.

¶22

The bail petition stands rejected.

¶23

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶24

atul/-

¶25

U T

Mantu Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mantu Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Iqram Vs The State of Bihar

Ashok Singh @ Ashok Kumar @ Pappu Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Ashok Tiwari Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Ekbal Rai Vs the State of Bihar

Munna Chaudhary @ Munna Vs the State of Bihar

Barak Paswan Vs The State of Bihar