Petitioner sought discharge of defects in a criminal appeal. The petition was dismissed after it was withdrawn by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Additionally, a direction was issued to remove defects within one month.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3861 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2021 Thana- DEHRI TOWN District- Rohtas
======================================================
UPENDRA SINGH Son of Laxmi Singh, Resident of Village Sakhra, P.S.Dehri (Muffasil), District - Rohtas.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sumeet Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shyameshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
2 04-07-2022
The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the office within one month.
The learned counsel for the petitioner wants to withdraw this petition.
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioner within the stipulated time mentioned hereinabove, failing which, the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.
(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)
Mahesh/-
U T
Upendra Singh
The State of Bihar
Nawneet Kumar Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
