Partly allowed

Pradeep Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC1 Jul 2022CR. MISC./19849/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna granted an extension of time for surrenders and bail bonds in an anticipatory bail matter, directing deposit of Rs. 3,000 each to the District Legal Services Authority within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Extension of time for surrender and furnishing bail bonds by four weeks, subject to deposit of Rs. 3,000 by each petitioner to the District Legal Services Authority.

Pradeep Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19849 of 2022

¶2

¶3

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.68451 of 2019

¶4

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-75 Year-2019 Thana- IMAMGANJ District- Gaya

¶5

======================================================

¶6

PRADEEP YADAV S/o Lattu Yadav R/o village- Chhakar Banda, Bhandar, P.S.- Imamganj, District- Gaya

¶7

Sumit Yadav @ Sumit Kumar S/o Lattu Yadav R/o village- Chhakar Banda, Bhandar, P.S.- Imamganj, District- Gaya

¶8

Chinta Devi W/o Pramod Yadav R/o village- Chhakar Banda, Bhandar, P.S.Imamganj, District- Gaya

¶9

Gangotri Devi W/o Lattu Yadav R/o village- Chhakar Banda, Bhandar, P.S.Imamganj, District- Gaya

¶10

Mamta Devi W/o Pradeep Yadav R/o village- Chhakar Banda, Bhandar, P.S.Imamganj, District- Gaya

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶15

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Md. Javed Jafar Khan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Zainul Abedin ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY

¶16

ORAL ORDER

¶17

2 01-07-2022 Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to

¶18

remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month.

¶19

The present application has been filed for modification of the order dated 06.03.2020, passed in Cr.Misc. No. 68451 of 2019, by which the petitioners were granted anticipatory bail.

¶20

It is submitted that due to communication gap, the

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19849 of 2022(2) dt.01-07-2022 2/2

¶22

petitioners could not surrender in the court below and furnish the bail bonds within the stipulated time.

¶23

For the reasons disclosed in the application, it is allowed and the time granted by order dated 06.03.2020, passed in Cr.Misc. No. 68451 of 2019 for surrender of the petitioners and furnishing bail bond is extended by four weeks from today, subject to deposit of Rs. 3,000/- each by the petitioners to the District Legal Services Authority. At the time of surrender, the petitioners shall furnish the receipt showing deposit of Rs. 3,000/- each by the petitioners to the District Legal Services Authority.

¶24

Office shall ensure that all the defects are removed by the petitioners within the stipulated time provided in para 1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

¶25

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

¶26

HR/-

¶27

U T

Pradeep Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pradeep Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikram Kumar @ Amit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Jokhan Choudhary @ Jakhan Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Lalgendra Mahto @ Lalgendra Kumar Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Munna Kumar (Devar) Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Hajrat @ Md. Hajrat Ali Vs the State of Bihar

Mukesh Mahto @ Mukesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar