Disposed

Munna Kumar (Devar) v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC1 Jul 2022CR. MISC./26094/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge upheld the extension of the time granted for the petitioners to surrender and furnish bail bond in an anticipatory bail matter. Directed removal of defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month, failing which the matter could be brought to the Court's notice.

What did the court decide?

Request to modify previous order was allowed; time for surrender extended by four weeks; deposit of Rs. 2,000/- each directed.

Munna Kumar (Devar) Vs the State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26094 of 2022

¶2

¶3

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20468 of 2020

¶4

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-65 Year-2019 Thana- SONBERSA District- Sitamarhi

¶5

======================================================

¶6

MUNNA KUMAR (Devar) S/o Rajendra Mandal Resident of VillageChhoti Singvahini, P.S.- Sonbarsa, District- Sitamarhi.

¶7

Dipu Kumar (Devar) S/o Rajendra Mandal Resident of Village- Chhoti Singvahini, P.S.- Sonbarsa, District- Sitamarhi.

¶8

Radha Devi (Sas) W/o Rajendra Mandal Resident of Village- Chhoti Singvahini, P.S.- Sonbarsa, District- Sitamarhi.

¶9

Kanchan Devi (Devrani) W/o Munna Kumar Resident of Village- Chhoti Singvahini, P.S.- Sonbarsa, District- Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioners

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party

¶14

======================================================

¶15

Appearance :

¶16

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Suman Kumari Singh

¶17

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY

¶18

ORAL ORDER

¶19

2 01-07-2022

¶20

Learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter within one month.

¶21

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Addl.P.P. for the State through video conferencing.

¶22

The present application has been filed for modification of the order dated 13.07.2020 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 20468 of 2020 by which the petitioners were granted anticipatory bail.

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26094 of 2022(2) dt.01-07-2022 2/2

¶24

It is submitted that due to some unavoidable circumstances, the petitioners could not surrender in the court below and furnish the bail bond within the stipulated time.

¶25

For the reasons disclosed in the application, it is allowed and the time granted by the order dated 13.07.2020, passed in Cr. Misc. No. 20468 of 2020 for surrender of the petitioners and furnishing bail bond is extended by four weeks from today, subject to deposit of Rs. 2,000/- each to the District Legal Services Authority.

¶26

At the time of surrender, the petitioners shall furnish the receipt showing deposit of Rs. 2,000/- each to the District Legal Services Authority.

¶27

Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioners within the stipulated time provided in para-1 hereinabove, failing which the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

¶28

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J)

¶29

SONALI/- U T

Munna Kumar (Devar) v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Munna Kumar (Devar) v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikram Kumar @ Amit Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Jokhan Choudhary @ Jakhan Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Lalgendra Mahto @ Lalgendra Kumar Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Pradeep Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Hajrat @ Md. Hajrat Ali Vs the State of Bihar

Mukesh Mahto @ Mukesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar