Mithilesh Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
In a criminal miscellaneous matter regarding an anticipatory bail application, the Patna High Court heard the case involving domestic violence and matrimonial disputes and rejected the petitioner's prayer due to grievous injuries inflicted on the informant.
What did the court decide?
Anticipatory bail prayer rejected.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14194 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-188 Year-2020 Thana- RANIGANJ District- Araria
====================================================== MITHILESH KUMAR YADAV S/O RAMCHANDRA YADAV, R/O VILLAGE-MAJAHA, RAGHUNATHPUR, WARD NO. 4, P.S.BHARGAMA, DISTRICT-ARARIA.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Sharma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Umesh Prasad Mr. Shailendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY
ORAL ORDER
6 04-07-2022
The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects, if any, pointed out by the office within one month.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner deserves the privileges for anticipatory bail given the nature of injuries sustained by the informant?
How does the court characterize the dispute between the parties in the facts of this case?
Parties & counsel
- applicant
MITHILESH KUMAR YADAV
Coram
NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court