The High Court of Patna dismissed the petitioner's application for anticipatory bail in a case under Sections 406 and 409 IPC. The Court declined to interfere with earlier orders made in connection with the petition.
Application for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner stands dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16471 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-66 Year-2018 Thana- CHAUTHAM District- Khagaria
======================================================
Amar Kumar Son of Indradeo Rajak Resident of Village - Telauchh, P.S.Parbatta, Distt.- Khagaria.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Saket Tiwary For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. A.G. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER
6 30-03-2022
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a
case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 409 of the Indian Penal Code.
It appears that vide order dated 01.02.2019
passed in Cr. Misc. No. 5846 of 2019, the anticipatory bail petition of the petitioner was disposed off with a direction to surrender before learned Court below within a period of six weeks and pray for regular bail which was to be considered on the basis of materials available on record. However, the petitioner could not surrender
before learned Court below and a modification application has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16471 of 2021(6) dt.30-03-2022 2/2
modifying the earlier order which was dismissed vide order dated 16.10.2019 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 64157 of 2019.
The petitioner has again filed a fresh anticipatory bail petition before this Court.
This Court is not inclined to interfere with the
earlier orders passed by this Court.
Accordingly, the application for grant of
anticipatory bail to the petitioner stands dismissed.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)
Shageer/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner should be allowed considering the failure to surrender and earlier dismissal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Amar Kumar
Sunil Kumar Panwar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
