The High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioners in a case registered under Section 366(A) and 34 of the IPC regarding the abduction of a minor girl, subject to conditions and furnishing of bonds.
Petitioners be released on anticipatory bail upon surrender or arrest, furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.26297 of 2021
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-168 Year-2016 Thana- CHIRAIYA District- East Champaran
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Sharda Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER
5 29-03-2022
APP for the State.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
It is a case of abduction of the minor girl of the informant by the accused persons.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the victim girl in para-16 of the case diary has stated that the victim girl stated in her statement that she solemnized marriage with one Jitendra Sahni and she has not
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.26297 of 2021(5) dt.29-03-2022 2/2
stated about the complicity of the petitioner in this case. She has further stated that she blessed a child from her husband, namely, Jitendra Sahni and her age is about 26 years. Petitioners have got clean antecedent.
Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM-IV, Sikarhana at Dhaka, District- East Champaran in connection with Chiraiya P.S. Case No. 168 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
Brajesh Kumar/- U T
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are entitled to anticipatory bail in a case of alleged abduction of a minor girl.
Whether the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the criminal case.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Lalsa Devi
Bullet Rai
The State Of Bihar
Sunil Kumar Panwar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
