Allowed

Bhim Yadav @ Jaydev Kumar Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC29 Mar 2022CR. MISC./27224/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous matter, the Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a case involving recovery of foreign liquor. The order required the petitioner to surrender within four weeks and furnish bail bonds with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner allowed anticipatory bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties.

Bhim Yadav @ Jaydev Kumar Yadav Vs the State of Bihar — Corruption | Patna HC (2022)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.27224 of 2021

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-586 Year-2019 Thana- GAYA KOTWALI District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

BHIM YADAV @ JAYDEV KUMAR YADAV S/O FUCHCHU YADAV R/O VILLAGE-GEWAL BIGHA, P.S-RAMPUR, DISTRICT-GAYA.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vinod Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Kumar Ranjit Ranjan, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 29-03-2022

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner is apprehending is arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420 and 406/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 30(a), 54 and 57 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶15

It is a case of recovery of about 2195.85 liters of foreign liquor from a truck.

¶16

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that neither the truck belongs to the petitioner nor seizure was made from the premises of the petitioner. He further submits that similarly situated co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail by different Benches of this

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.27224 of 2021(3) dt.29-03-2022 2/2

¶18

Court.

¶19

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

¶20

In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, Gaya in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 586 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶21

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶22

Brajesh Kumar/- U T

Bhim Yadav @ Jaydev Kumar Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhim Yadav @ Jaydev Kumar Yadav v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rahul Choudhary @ Rahul Kumar Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Avinash Kumar @ Abhinash Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Suraj Kumar @ Sonu Vs The State of Bihar

Anita Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Lalsa Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Laxmina Devi Vs The State of Bihar