Oral order where counsel jointly submitted that petitioner's grievances were redressed; writ petition disposed of as infructuous without substantive reasoning.
Petition disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7784 of 2020
======================================================
Reena Kumari @ Reena Devi Widow of Late Shachin Tyagi, Resident of Nibhrit Niwas, Parshuram Sthan, Mokama, P.O./P.S.-Mokama, District-Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sidhendra Narayan Singh For the Respondent/s : Mr.Kinkar Kumar ( Sc9 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER
that the grievances of the petitioner has stood redressed.
Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed
of as having become infructuous.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)
rinkee/-
U
Reena Kumari
State of Bihar
Nagar Parishad, Mokama
Mohit Kumar Shah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
