Petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition due to delay and laches, with liberty to approach Respondent No. 4 for grievance redressal.
Writ petition disposed of as not pressed with liberty to move Respondent No. 4.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20804 of 2018
======================================================
Mani Bhushan S/o Anil Kumar Singh, Resident of KJailashpuri, Ward No.-10, P.S.- Dumra, District- Sitamarhi.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sheo Kumar Prasad For the Respondent/s : Mr.Sarvesh Kumar, GP-24 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER
5 15-03-2021 The learned counsel for the petitioner, realizing the impediment in the present writ petition on account of delay and laches on the part of the petitioner, seeks to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to move the respondent no. 4 for redressal of his grievances.
Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed off as not pressed, however, with the aforesaid liberty.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)
S.Sb/-
U
Mani Bhushan
State of Bihar
Mohit Kumar Shah
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
