The petitioner's application for anticipatory bail arising from an FIR under Sections 498-A, 494, 504, 506/34 of the IPC was dismissed because the petitioner sought to withdraw the application.
The application for anticipatory bail was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9080 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-140 Year-2019 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Patna
======================================================
PRAVIN KUMAR, aged about 34 years (Male), S/o Gopal Prasad, R/o Village- Govind Mithra Road, Beni Madhav Lane (Navin Sweets), P.O.Bankipur, P.S.- Pirbahore, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
... ... Opposite Parties
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satrudhan Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Atul Chandra, APP For the Opp. Party No.2 : Mr. Kaushal Kishore, Advocate ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER
3 25-11-2021 This application for anticipatory bail arises out of Mahila P.S. Case No. 140 of 2019 for the offence punishable under Sections 498-A, 494, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this bail application.
Accordingly, this bail application is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Sandeep Kumar, J)
pawan/-
U T
Pravin Kumar
The State of Bihar
Rimpi Kumari
Sandeep Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
