Allowed

Jitendra Sahni @ Jitendra Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC25 Nov 2021CR. MISC./12623/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Hon'ble High Court of Judicature at Patna allowed an anticipatory bail application by the petitioner held responsible for offences under Sections 363/366/34 IPC, finding the victim willingly accompanied him.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail before court below within four weeks, furnishing bonds of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of like amount.

Jitendra Sahni @ Jitendra Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12623 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-224 Year-2019 Thana- LALGANJ District- Vaishali

¶3

======================================================

¶4

JITENDRA SAHNI @ JITENDRA KUMAR Son of Saudagar Sahni Resident of Village - Zafarabad, P.S. - Lalganj, District - Vaishali

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Manohar Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Jai Narain Thakur, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

5 25-11-2021

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶13

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Lalganj P.S. Case No. 224/2019 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363/366/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

From the reading of the statement recorded under Section 164 Cr. P.C. and the medical examination and also the age assessment, it appears that the victim who is a major has willingly accompanied the petitioner and after staying with him at different places, she has come back. Though, in her statement recorded under Section 164 of the Cr. P.C., she has tried to give it a colour of abduction, but during the entire period of her disappearance, she did not raise any hulla that she was being

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12623 of 2020(5) dt.25-11-2021 2/2

¶16

forcibly taken.

¶17

Considering the facts and circumstances, the present anticipatory bail application is allowed.

¶18

Accordingly, let the petitioner above named be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-XIV, Vaishali at Hajipur, in connection with Lalganj P.S. Case No. 224/2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶19

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

¶20

Saif/-

¶21

U T

Jitendra Sahni @ Jitendra Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jitendra Sahni @ Jitendra Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mankhush Kumar @ Ravi Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Pawan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ashutosh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Binod Rai Vs the State of Bihar

Pravin Kumar Vs the State of Bihar