Ranjit Kumar Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sheo Kumar Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.A.G. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 15-03-2021

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶13

counsel for the State.

¶14

In this case, petitioners are seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Rajauli P.S. Case No. 184 of 2020 registered for offence punishable under sections 30 (a)/41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶15

Allegation has been made that 120 litres of liquor has been recovered and the police found the involvement of the petitioners with the said liquor.

¶16

Looking to the entirety of the matter, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners and accordingly their prayer for bail is rejected. However, if petitioners surrender

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34486 of 2020(2) dt.15-03-2021 2/2

¶18

before the court below, the court below without being prejudiced by this order, will take decision in accordance with law, preferably on the same day.

¶19

(Shivaji Pandey, J)

¶20

Mahesh/-

¶21

U T

Ranjit Kumar Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjit Kumar Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gopal Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Ramu Nat Vs The State of Bihar

Dhanuk @ Dhiru Yadav @ Dheeraj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Brij Kishore Pandey Vs The State of Bihar

Anil Ravidas Vs The State of Bihar

Umesh Mallah Vs The State of Bihar