Dismissed

Dhanuk @ Dhiru Yadav @ Dheeraj Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC9 Mar 2021CR. MISC./19205/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court dismissed the bail petition filed by the petitioner accused in narcotic and prohibition cases on the ground of suppression of material facts regarding his criminal antecedents. The Court imposed a penalty of Rs. 5,000/- on the person who swore the affidavit.

What did the court decide?

Cost of Rs. 5,000/- to be deposited by the person who swore the affidavit in this bail petition.

Dhanuk @ Dhiru Yadav @ Dheeraj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Corruption | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19205 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-54 Year-2019 Thana- SHERGHATI District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

DHANUK @ DHIRU YADAV @ DHEERAJ YADAV, aged about 36 years, Son of Bangali Yadav, resident of Village - Bankat Paharpur, P.S.-Amas, District-Gaya.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anuj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, APP ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶10

5 09-03-2021

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶12

In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Sherghati (Dobhi) P.S. Case No. 54 of 2019 (N.D.P.S. Case No. 11 of 2019) registered for the offence under Sections 414/34 of the Indian Penal Code, under Sections 30(a) (d) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 and under Sections 18, 19, 20 and 21 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

¶13

In paragraph no.3 of the bail petition, it has been stated that the petitioner is accused in two other criminal cases but, the case diary shows that the petitioner is also accused in different criminal cases. Hence, it is a suppression of material fact regarding criminal antecedents.

¶14

In such view of the matter, this bail petition is dismissed alone on the ground of suppression of material fact

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19205 of 2020(5) dt.09-03-2021 2/2

¶16

with cost of Rs.5,000/- to be deposited by the person, who has sworn the affidavit in this bail petition, in the coffers of the Patna High Court Legal Services Committee within a period of four weeks from today, failing which, the aforesaid amount of cost will be recovered from the person concerned by the Collector, Gaya, as land revenue.

¶17

(Shivaji Pandey, J)

¶18

pawan/-

¶19

U T

Dhanuk @ Dhiru Yadav @ Dheeraj Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhanuk @ Dhiru Yadav @ Dheeraj Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Basudev Yadav @ Basudev Tiwari @ Tiwari Vs The State of Bihar

Nagmani Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Angrej Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Ramu Nat Vs The State of Bihar

Jai Kishun Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Abhishek Kumar Vs The State of Bihar