Dismissed

Anil Ravidas v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC15 Mar 2021CR. MISC./32810/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought anticipatory bail in connection with offences under various sections of the IPC including murder and rioting. The High Court rejected the prayer for anticipatory bail, directing petitioners to surrender for regular bail before the court below.

What did the court decide?

Bail prayed for was rejected. Petitioners directed to surrender before the court below to seek regular bail.

Anil Ravidas Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2021)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32810 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-92 Year-2020 Thana- KAUWAKOL District- Nawada

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Anil Ravidas S/o Kameshwar Ravidas, Resident of Village-Skhodewara Tola, Shivpur, P.S.-Kawakol, District-Nawada.

¶5

Prakash Ravidas S/o Kameshwar Ravidas, Resident of Village-Skhodewara Tola, Shivpur, P.S.-Kawakol, District-Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. A.G. ======================================================

¶6

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY

¶7

ORAL ORDER

¶8

3 15-03-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

¶9

In this case, petitioners are seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Kawakol P.S. Case No. 92 of 2020 registered for offence punishable under sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 447, 448, 302, 307, 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶10

As per allegation, 17 persons assembled and killed two persons by traditional weapons.

¶11

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is no specific allegation made against these petitioners rather omnibus allegation has been made against them, but the fact is that 17 persons assembled and they had gone for ransacking and started assaulting the victim so it is very difficult to give the clear picture that who had done the aforesaid offence.

¶12

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32810 of 2020(3) dt.15-03-2021 2/2

¶13

It has also been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that other co-accused persons have been granted regular bail by one of the coordinate Bench of this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 28997 of 2020.

¶14

Looking to the entirety of the matter, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioners and accordingly their prayer for bail is rejected. However, if petitioners surrender before the court below and pray for regular bail, the court below without being prejudiced by this order, will take decision in accordance with law.

¶15

(Shivaji Pandey, J)

¶16

Mahesh/-

¶17

U T

Anil Ravidas v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anil Ravidas v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gopal Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Ramu Nat Vs The State of Bihar

Dhanuk @ Dhiru Yadav @ Dheeraj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Brij Kishore Pandey Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjit Kumar Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Umesh Mallah Vs The State of Bihar