Disposed

Rajendra Jha v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC22 Jun 2020CWJC/3136/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this oral order, the Hon'ble High Court disposed of a writ petition seeking a mandamus for revised pension benefits. The court granted liberty to the petitioner to file a representation, directing the concerned authorities to consider it within four months.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to file representation; authorities directed to consider it and pass order within four months.

Rajendra Jha Vs The State of Bihar — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3136 of 2020

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Rajendra Jha Son of the Late Anant Jha, Resident of Ward no.4, Begampur, P.S. Khodawandpur, District-Begusarai.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Patna.

¶7

The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The District Education Officer, Begusarai.

¶10

... ... Respondent/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar Mishra For the Respondent/s : Mr.Prabhakar Jha (GP27) ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 22-06-2020

¶14

Due to COVID-19 Pandemic, the matter is being

¶15

taken up by way of virtual Court proceeding.

¶16

The matter has been listed under the heading ‘For

¶17

Orders’ under the orders of Hon’ble the Chief Justice.

¶18

Heard the parties.

¶19

Following relief(s) have been sought for by the

¶20

petitioner in the present writ application:

¶21

“For issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus or any appropriate writ/writs commanding the respondents concerned particularly Respondents No. 2 & 3 to provide the petitioner with the benefit of the revised pension by giving benefit of notional pay fixation with protection of

¶22

Patna High Court CWJC No.3136 of 2020(2) dt.22-06-2020 2/2

¶23

seniority as also for payment of the amount accrued to the petitioner by virtue of his entitlement in respect of different heads after superannuation from service”.

¶24

Learned counsel for the petitioner is granted liberty to file a representation before the concerned authority for redressal of his grievance.

¶25

In case, any such representation is filed, the concerned authority shall consider the representation of the petitioner and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law, within a period of four months from the date of filing/making of such representation.

¶26

With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present writ application stands disposed of.

¶27

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶28

A.K.V.//-

¶29

Rajendra Jha v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajendra Jha v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ravi Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sunil Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Pankaj Yadav @ Pankaj Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Syed Mohammad Fahimuddin Ashraf Vs The State of Bihar

Parmanand Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Rambahadur Sahni Vs The State of Bihar