The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a criminal case threatening his arrest, subject to personal bond and future furnishing of security bonds.
Grant of anticipatory bail on personal bond, releasing Rs. 10,000 upon restoration of normalcy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1545 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-118 Year-2019 Thana- SILAO District- Nalanda
======================================================
SUNIL YADAV Son of Varan Yadav @ Ram Varan Yadav Resident of Village - Surumpur, Police Station- Silao, District - Nalanda.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anil Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Umesh Lal Verma ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER
3 19-06-2020
Due to COVID-19 Pandemic, the matter is being taken up by way of Virtual Court proceeding.
The matter has been listed under the heading ‘For Orders’ under the orders of Hon’ble the Chief Justice.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The prosecution case, in short, is that while the husband of the informant was going to field to pluck vegetables, the accused persons started abusing and assaulted him due to which he sustained injury.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1545 of 2020(3) dt.19-06-2020 2/2
tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Both parties are agnates. The nature of injury is said to be simple. Hence, no offence under Section 307 IPC is made out.
On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R./complaint case.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the lockdown, the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on his personal bond to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Silao P.S. Case No. 118/2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioner shall furnish bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of seven weeks to the satisfaction of the Court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.
(Sudhir Singh, J)
Pankaj/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail in a case involving Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504/34 of the IPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sunil Yadav
The State of Bihar
Sudhir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
