Single judge oral order disposing of a writ petition seeking revised pension benefit. Court granted liberty to file representation with Respondent No. 2, directing consideration and appropriate order within four months.
Liberty granted to petitioner to file representation; respondent to consider and pass appropriate order within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3127 of 2020
======================================================
Parmanand Mahto Son of Late Raghunandan Mahto Resident of Mohanpur, P.S.- Khodawandpur, District- Begusarai.
... ... Petitioner/s
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar Mishra For the Respondent/s : Mr.Smt.Shilpa Singh (GA12) ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH
ORAL ORDER
2 22-06-2020
Due to COVID-19 Pandemic, the matter is being
taken up by way of virtual Court proceeding.
The matter has been listed under the heading ‘For
Orders’ under the orders of Hon’ble the Chief Justice.
Heard the parties.
Following relief(s) have been sought for by the
petitioner in the present writ application:
“For issuance of writ in the nature of Mandamus or any appropriate writ/writs commanding the Respondents concerned particularly Respondents No. 2 and 3 to provide the petitioner with the benefit of the revised pension by giving benefit of notional pay fixation with protection of seniority as also for payment of the amount accrued to
Patna High Court CWJC No.3127 of 2020(2) dt.22-06-2020 2/2
the petitioner by virtue of his entitlement in respect of different heads after superannuation from service”.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is granted liberty to
file a representation before the respondent No. 2 for redressal of his grievance.
In case, any such representation is filed, the respondent No. 2 shall consider the representation of the petitioner and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law, within a period of four months from the date of filing/making of such representation.
With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present writ application stands disposed of.
(Sudhir Singh, J)
A.K.V.//-
U
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to benefit of revised pension with notional pay fixation and seniority protection.
Whether the respondents shall issue appropriate order within four months after consideration of representation.
Parmanand Mahto
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Patna
The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna
The Education Officer, Begusarai
Sudhir Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
