was submitted that the same is totally false and concocted as the petitioner has no connection with Rajesh Yadav/Rajesh Rai and even during investigation, the police has found that the mobile number disclosed in the FIR belonged to Rajesh Yadav and not the petitioner. It was submitted that the petitioner, his uncle, the informant as well as Rajesh Yadav are all neighbours and in the earlier case filed by the elder daughter of the informant against Pramod Rai and Rajesh Rai, both sons of Banshi Rai, the paternal uncle of the petitioner, who is a practising advocate in the Civil Court at Siwan, had moved petition for bail due to enmity, in the present case, the petitioner has also been named. Learned counsel submitted that the petitioner is working abroad since more than 10 years and has three children to take care of. It was further submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Learned counsel submitted that the younger daughter of the informant, who is said to be the victim in the present case is in fact living with her maternal aunt at Panipat in the State of Haryana and the petitioner has been implicated falsely with mali fide intention.
