Oral order declining bail for petitioner caught in dacoity case with antecedents, directing renewal of bail prayer post-framing of charges.
Prayer for bail refused; petitioner directed to renew prayer after framing of charges.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5526 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-341 Year-2019 Thana- SAHEBGANJ District- Muzaffarpur
======================================================
RAHUL SINGH Son of Kanchha Singh Resident of Village - Dhanaiya, P.S.Sahebganj, District- Muzaffarpur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anish Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER
4 18-06-2020 The matter has been taken up through video
conferencing.
Heard the parties.
Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 399,402 of the Indian Penal Code and 25(I-b)A, 26,35 Arms Act.
One pistol and two live cartridges were allegedly recovered from possession of the petitioner when the petitioner and two others were apprehended on suspicion that they and others were going to commit dacoity. Petitioner is in custody since 07.09.2019. Investigation of the case is complete. However, petitioner has got three criminal antecedents.
Considering the aforesaid fact, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail for the present in connection with
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5526 of 2020(4) dt.18-06-2020 2/2
Sahebganj P.S.Case No.341 of 2019 pending in the court of learned A.C.J.M. 1st (West) -cum-Sub-Judge, Muzaffarpur. Hence, prayer is refused.
However, petitioner may renew prayer for bail after framing of the charges.
(Birendra Kumar, J)
Nitesh/-
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is eligible for bail in the first instance given his antecedents and the nature of the offence.
When the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
RAHUL SINGH
The State of Bihar
BIRENDRA KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
