Dismissed

Ramashankar Singh v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC18 Jun 2020CR. MISC./2402/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an anticipatory bail petition filed by six accused facing charges of attempted murder, robbery, and grievous hurt, the Patna High Court refused the prayer for anticipatory bail, noting the gravity of allegations regarding the attempt to cause death.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for anticipatory bail refused. Prayer for regular bail on surrender reserved for future consideration.

Ramashankar Singh Vs the State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2402 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-346 Year-2019 Thana- BASANTPUR District- Siwan

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RAMASHANKAR SINGH Son of Late Ram Jatan Singh

¶5

Bhutti Singh @ Butti Singh Son of Late Ram Jatan Singh

¶6

Saheb Kumar Son of Tarak Singh

¶7

Manjeet Kumar Son of Tarak Singh

¶8

Rohit Kumar Singh @ Rohit Kumar Son of Brij Singh

¶9

Nitin Kumar Son of Tarak Singh

¶10

All Resident of Village - Kanhauli, P.S.- Basantpur, District- Siwan

¶11

... ... Petitioner/s

¶12

Versus

¶13

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s

¶14

======================================================

¶15

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ramchandra Sahni, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nawal Kishore Prasad, APP ======================================================

¶16

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR

¶17

ORAL ORDER

¶18

3 18-06-2020

¶19

The matter has been taken up through video

¶20

conferencing.

¶21

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶22

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a

¶23

case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341,323,324,379,307,504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶24

During occurrence of assault, some of the petitioners are specifically alleged to have caused injury at the head though the Doctor has found simple injury.

¶25

The act of the petitioners would show that they

¶26

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2402 of 2020(3) dt.18-06-2020 2/2

¶27

had knowledge that their act might cause death.

¶28

Hence, I am not inclined to enlarge the

¶29

petitioners on anticipatory bail in connection with Basantpur P.S.Case No.346 of 2019 pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial magistrate, Siwan. Prayer is refused.

¶30

In the event of surrender, prayer of the petitioners for regular bail shall be considered on its own merit without being prejudiced by this order.

¶31

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶32

Nitesh/-

¶33

U T

Ramashankar Singh v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramashankar Singh v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Harendra Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Vinay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Dhananjay Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Dr. Sunil Dubey @ Sunil Kumar Dubey Vs the State of Bihar

Kallu Khan @ Firoj Khan Vs The State of Bihar

Rahul Singh Vs The State of Bihar