Allowed

Dhananjay Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC17 Jun 2020CR. MISC./1880/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to Dhananjay Yadav, who was not named in the FIR but apprehended arrest in a 461/379 IPC case due to a co-accused's confession, directing his release on surrender within 30 days.

What did the court decide?

Released on anticipatory bail via surrender within thirty days, bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of the like amount, subject to conditions laid under Section 438(2) CrPC.

Dhananjay Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 1880 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-272 Year-2019 Thana- BAKHARI District- Begusarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

DHANANJAY YADAV, S/o Late Naresh Yadav, Resident of Village - Amari, P.S. - Shekhupur Sarai, Distt. - Shekhpura.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhola Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Iftekhar Mahmood, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

4 17-06-2020 The matter has been taken up through Video Conferencing.

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶13

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 461 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

Petitioner is not named in the FIR registered for offences under Sections 461 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. In another case coaccused confessed before the police and in that name of the petitioner surfaced.

¶15

Submission is that no incriminating material was

¶16

recovered from possession of the petitioner.

¶17

Since there is no direct material against the petitioner,

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 1880 of 2020(4) dt.17-06-2020 2/2

¶19

let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Bakhari Police Station Case No. 272 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as subject to the following conditions:-

¶20

(a) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the learned court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

¶21

(b) Both the bailors shall be resident of the territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below.

¶22

¶23

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶24

Kundan/-

¶25

U T

Dhananjay Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhananjay Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pavitri Devi @ Parwati Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Sk. Saddam @ Shekh Saddam Vs the State of Bihar

Sanjeev Yadav @ Sanjiv Yadav Vs The Union of India, through the Intelligence Officer, Narcotics Controal Bureau, Patna Zonal Unit

Harendra Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Vinay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Shahid Vs The State of Bihar