Allowed

Ajay Kumar Jha @ Ajay Jha @ Babua Don v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC11 Nov 2020CR. MISC./29764/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna, on an application for bail in a case involving offenses under Sections 414 and 349 IPC and Arms Act, directed the release of the petitioner on bail by furnishing bonds and sureties, noting the prolonged custody and lack of Section 100 Cr.P.C. compliance.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.

Ajay Kumar Jha @ Ajay Jha @ Babua Don Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29764 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-41 Year-2020 Thana- MITHANPURA District- Muzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

AJAY KUMAR JHA @ AJAY JHA @ BABUA DON Son of Kameshwar Jha Resident of Village - Dharmagatpur (Gangati), P.S.- Sakra, District - Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ravi Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Panchanan Pandit, APP. ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 11-11-2020

¶13

Due to COVID-19 Pandemic, the matter is being

¶14

taken up by way of Virtual Court proceeding.

¶15

The matter has been listed under the heading ‘For Orders’ under the orders of Hon’ble the Chief Justice.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the Office, within a period of four weeks from the date of restoration of normalcy.

¶17

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶18

APP for the State.

¶19

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 414, 349 of the Indian Penal Code and 25(1-A)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

¶20

Prosecution case, in short, is that one country made

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29764 of 2020(2) dt.11-11-2020 2/2

¶22

loaded pistol along with one live cartridge is recovered.

¶23

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 15.02.2020. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. It is alleged that one country made pistol along with one live cartridge is recovered. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C. The petitioner has already remained in custody for more than six months.

¶24

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

¶25

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is directed that the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., East, Muzaffarpur in connection with Mithanpura P.S. Case No. 41/2020.

¶26

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶27

Pankaj/-

¶28

U T

Ajay Kumar Jha @ Ajay Jha @ Babua Don v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajay Kumar Jha @ Ajay Jha @ Babua Don v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Daud Vs The State of Bihar

Sunita Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Rupesh Kumar @ Rupesh @ Golu Vs The State of Bihar

Vicky Singh @ Vicky Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Manoj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar