Allowed

Sunita Devi v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC10 Nov 2020CR. MISC./25329/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act case involving the recovery of ganja from a petitioner's bag during a train search, the High Court granted bail. The court considered the quantity recovered from the petitioner versus the co-accused and noted allegations regarding procedural compliance.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail by furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each.

Sunita Devi Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25329 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2020 Thana- SAMSTIPUR RAIL P.S DistrictSamastipur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SUNITA DEVI, (F), age 37 years, W/O Mukhlal Gosai, Resident of VillageRupahi Tar (Rupahi Tand), P.S.-Bhitaha O.P (Thakaraha), District-West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr.Vijay Kr Singh No. 1, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Parmeshwar Mehta, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 10-11-2020

¶12

Due to COVID-19 Pandemic, the matter is being

¶13

taken up by way of virtual Court proceeding.

¶14

The matter has been listed under the heading ‘For

¶15

Orders’ under the orders of Hon’ble the Chief Justice.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks after restoration of normalcy.

¶17

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶18

The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offence registered under Section 20 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

¶19

The prosecution story, in brief, is that on getting such information about carrying substance like Ganja , the Railway

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25329 of 2020(3) dt.10-11-2020 2/3

¶21

Police entered into the particular Coach and found one woman and one man travelling in a Train from Tata to Muzaffarpur and on search, it is alleged that 2.148 kgs., Ganja is recovered from the bag of Sunita Devi (petitioner) and 23.297 kgs., Ganja is recovered from the Attachie of co-accused Ranjan Prazapati.

¶22

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 13.01.2020. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Charge sheet has been submitted in the present case. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner is a lady. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Total 25.445 kgs., Ganja is said to have been recovered. Out of which, 2.148 kgs., Ganja is said to have been recovered from the bag of the petitioner and remaining 23.297 kgs., Ganja is said to have been recovered from the Attachie of co-accused, namely, Ranjan Prajapati. The recovered Ganja from possession of the petitioner is below the commercial quantity. Hence, Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act is not applicable in the present case. Commercial quantity of Ganja is said to have been recovered from possession of co-accused Ranjan Prajapati. There is no compliance of Sections 42 and 50 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25329 of 2020(3) dt.10-11-2020 3/3

¶24

On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

¶25

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Samastipur, in connection with Samastipur Rail P.S. Case No. 08/2020.

¶26

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶27

U.K./- U T

Sunita Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunita Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jainath Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Paswan @ Santosh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Janu Mian Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Daud Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Shabbir Vs The State of Bihar