Allowed

Vicky Singh @ Vicky Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC11 Nov 2020CR. MISC./29713/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court ordered the release of Vicky Singh on bail in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 341, 323, 354(B) of the IPC and Section 37(C) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, directing him to furnish a bail bond with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each.

Vicky Singh @ Vicky Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29713 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-205 Year-2020 Thana- TARAIYA District- Saran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

VICKY SINGH @ VICKY KUMAR SINGH S/o Mr. Sanjay Singh @ Sanjay Kumar Singh Resident of Village- Taraiya, P.S.- Taraiya, District- Chapra, Saran, Bihar.

¶5

... ... Petitioner

¶6

Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bimlesh Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sufiyan, APP. ======================================================

¶7

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH

¶8

ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 11-11-2020

¶10

Due to COVID-19 Pandemic, the matter is being

¶11

taken up by way of Virtual Court proceeding.

¶12

The matter has been listed under the heading ‘For

¶13

Orders’ under the orders of Hon’ble the Chief Justice.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the Office, within a period of four weeks from the date of restoration of normalcy.

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶16

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Section 341, 323, 354(B) of the Indian Penal Code and 37(C) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶17

Prosecution case, in short, is that the accused person in drunken state came in the house of the informant misbehaved

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29713 of 2020(2) dt.11-11-2020 2/2

¶19

with her.

¶20

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 21.06.2020 and has got no criminal antecedent. Charge-sheet/prosecution report has been submitted in this case. There is a case and counter case between the parties. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner is alleged to be trying to misbehave in drunken state. The allegations made by the informant is denied by the petitioner. Annexure-2 is the counter case in which a free fight is alleged to have taken place between two families and the present case is outburst of the counter case.

¶21

On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/complaint case.

¶22

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is directed that the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional District & Sessions Judge-II, Saran in connection with Taraiya P.S. Case No. 205 of 2020.

¶23

Pankaj/-

¶24

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶25

U T

Vicky Singh @ Vicky Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vicky Singh @ Vicky Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Daud Vs The State of Bihar

Sunita Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Rupesh Kumar @ Rupesh @ Golu Vs The State of Bihar

Ajay Kumar Jha @ Ajay Jha @ Babua Don Vs The State of Bihar

Manoj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar