Allowed

Md. Daud v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC10 Nov 2020CR. MISC./29724/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

,The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in an NDPS and IPC case where ganja was recovered below commercial quantity. The Court directed the petitioner to remove procedural defects within four weeks after normalcy, allowing bail upon furnishing bond and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail by furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount each to Special Judge Darbhanga.

Md. Daud Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29724 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-182 Year-2020 Thana- LAHERIYASARAI District- Darbhanga

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MD. DAUD, aged about 27 years, Sex-Male, S/o Md. Kalim, Resident of Mohalla-Khajasarai, P.S.-Laheriasarai, District-Darbhanga.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr.Manish Kumar No. 13, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 10-11-2020

¶12

Due to COVID-19 Pandemic, the matter is being taken up by way of virtual Court proceeding.

¶13

The matter has been listed under the heading ‘For Orders’ under the orders of Hon’ble the Chief Justice.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks after restoration of normalcy.

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶16

The petitioner seeks bail in a case for the offence registered under Sections 188, 269/34 of the I.P.C., 21 and 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act.

¶17

The prosecution story, in brief, is that on 31.03.2020 at about 10. A.M., in the day, the informant and other police

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29724 of 2020(2) dt.10-11-2020 2/3

¶19

officials apprehended the petitioner and other co-accused Md. Saddam and recovered Spasmo Proxyvon Plus Tables, Pyeevon Spas Plus Tables , 200 gms., of Ganja , Mobile Cigarette and other articles from the Gumati of the petitioner.

¶20

It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 01.04.2020. The petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. Charge sheet has been submitted in the present case. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. 200 gms., of Ganja, allopathic medicines and other articles are said to have been recovered from the Gumti of the petitioner. The alleged recovered Ganja is below the commercial quantity. Hence, Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act is not applicable in the present case. There is no compliance of Sections 42 and 50 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

¶21

On behalf of the learned counsel for the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

¶22

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29724 of 2020(2) dt.10-11-2020 3/3

¶24

Special Judge-cum-Additional Sessions Judge-VI, Darbhanga, in connection with Laheriasarai P.S. Case No. 182 of 2020 giving rise to G.O. Case No. 11 of 2020.

¶25

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶26

U.K./- U T

Md. Daud v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Daud v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jainath Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Paswan @ Santosh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Janu Mian Vs the State of Bihar

Sunita Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Shabbir Vs The State of Bihar