Allowed

Pavitri Devi @ Parwati Devi v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC16 Jun 2020CR. MISC./2095/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This High Court order grants anticipatory bail to the petitioner, mother of one of the accused, in a case involving kidnapping and abduction under Section 366-A/34 of the IPC. The grant is conditional upon her surrender within thirty days and furnishing a bail bond.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted upon surrender within 30 days, furnishing bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties.

Pavitri Devi @ Parwati Devi Vs the State of Bihar — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2095 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-141 Year-2019 Thana- DEHRI TOWN District- Rohtas

¶3

======================================================

¶4

PAVITRI DEVI @ PARWATI DEVI Wife of Dular Chandra Chaudhary @ Dular Chand Chaudhary Resident of Village - Shankarpur, P.S.- Indrapuri (Dehri), District - Rohtas at Sasaram.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anjani Kumar Sinha No.1, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Chandra Bhushan Prasad, APP. ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 16-06-2020 This matter has been taken up through Video

¶12

Conferencing.

¶13

Heard the parties.

¶14

The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 366-A/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

The victim girl was recovered when she was going along with co-accused Virendra Kumar Chaudhary. The petitioner is mother of Virendra Kumar Chaudhary. Said Virendra Kumar Chaudhary has already been allowed anticipatory bail by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 17.02.2020 in Cr. Misc. No. 17 of 2020 for the reason that in her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. the victim stated that

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2095 of 2020(3) dt.16-06-2020 2/3

¶17

the petitioner and daughter of the petitioner had kidnapped her and co-accused Virendra was pressurizing her for marriage.

¶18

Submission is that the matter is of love affairs and for that reason the victim was seen by the family members along with co-accused Virendra Kumar Chaudhary.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid material as well as the fact that petitioner is a female, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Dehri (Indrapuri O.P.) P.S. Case No. 141 of 2019, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as subject to the following conditions:

¶20

(a) Both the bailors shall be the resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned Court-below.

¶21

(b) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

¶22

¶23

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2095 of 2020(3) dt.16-06-2020 3/3

¶24

permission of the trial Court.

¶25

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶26

mantreshwar/-

¶27

U T

Pavitri Devi @ Parwati Devi v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pavitri Devi @ Parwati Devi v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pawan Kumar Sahu Vs The State of Bihar

Shahrukh @ Shahrukh Khan Vs The State of Bihar

Harendra Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Sk. Saddam @ Shekh Saddam Vs the State of Bihar

Sanjeev Yadav @ Sanjiv Yadav Vs The Union of India, through the Intelligence Officer, Narcotics Controal Bureau, Patna Zonal Unit

Harendra Singh Vs The State of Bihar