Allowed

Harendra Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC16 Jun 2020CR. MISC./2055/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a Criminal Miscellaneous matter, the Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner who was apprehensive of arrest for offences under the IPC. The order imposed standard conditions, including cooperation with investigation and a restriction on leaving the country.

What did the court decide?

Granted anticipatory bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions including cooperation with investigation and not leaving the country.

Harendra Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2055 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2019 Thana- SANDESH District- Bhojpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Harendra Singh Son of Late Baliram Singh Resident of Village- Kusra (Kushare), P.S.- Sandesh, Distt- Bhojpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anil Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Anita Kumari Singh, APP. ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 16-06-2020

¶12

This matter has been taken up through Video

¶13

Conferencing.

¶14

Heard the parties.

¶15

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 468, 472, 489(A)(B)(C)(D)(E) and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

According to F.I.R., co-accused Adarsh Kumar was apprehended by the police and from his possession three counterfeit currency notes of Rs.100/- denomination was recovered. Said Adarsh Kumar disclosed the name of others as his criminal associates in use of counterfeit currency notes. The petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. After three months of investigation, name of the petitioner surfaced on suspicion, however nothing incriminating was recovered from possession

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2055 of 2020(3) dt.16-06-2020 2/2

¶18

of the petitioner.

¶19

Considering the fact that there is no direct material against the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Sandesh P.S. Case No. 10 of 2019, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as subject to the following conditions:

¶20

(a) Both the bailors shall be the resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned Court-below.

¶21

(b) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

¶22

¶23

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶24

mantreshwar/- U T

Harendra Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Harendra Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pawan Kumar Sahu Vs The State of Bihar

Shahrukh @ Shahrukh Khan Vs The State of Bihar

Harendra Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Pavitri Devi @ Parwati Devi Vs the State of Bihar

Sk. Saddam @ Shekh Saddam Vs the State of Bihar

Sanjeev Yadav @ Sanjiv Yadav Vs The Union of India, through the Intelligence Officer, Narcotics Controal Bureau, Patna Zonal Unit