Dismissed
Sk. Saddam @ Shekh Saddam v. the State of Bihar
Patna HCCR. MISC./2029/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2029 of 2020
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2017 Thana- SAHODARA District- West Champaran
======================================================
SK. SADDAM @ SHEKH SADDAM S/O Shekh Murtuja Resident of Village - Parsauni, P.S.- Sahodara, District - West Champaran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shantanu Kumar, APP. ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER
3 16-06-2020
This matter has been taken up through Video
Conferencing.
Heard the parties.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Bihar Minor Minerals Concessions Rules, 1972.
According to F.I.R., the petitioner and others were involved in illegal mining of sand. The F.I.R. reveals that the villagers had disclosed the name of the petitioner and others. The case diary would reveal that the witness Israel Dewan and others have stated that the petitioner was also involved in illegal mining of sand. Petitioner has got a long list of criminal antecedent.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2029 of 2020(3) dt.16-06-2020 2/2
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that some other co-accused have already been allowed anticipatory bail in this case as there was no direct material against them.
Considering the material as disclosed above as well as criminal antecedent of the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in connection with Sahodara P.S. Case No. 30 of 2017.
Hence, prayer for bail of the petitioner is refused.
(Birendra Kumar, J)
mantreshwar/-
U T
SK. Saddam @ Shekh Saddam
The State of Bihar
Birendra Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court