Allowed

Pawan Kumar Sahu v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC15 Jun 2020CR. MISC./1978/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an oral order, the High Court of Patna considered a petition for anticipatory bail. The petitioner faced charges of kidnapping and criminal conspiracy. The court relied on the victim's statement suggesting voluntary departure. It granted anticipatory bail subject to conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted against Sections 366(A)/34 IPC on furnishing a bond and two sureties of Rs. 20,000 each, subject to conditions.

Pawan Kumar Sahu Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2020)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1978 of 2020

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-167 Year-2019 Thana- GHANSHYAMPUR District- Darbhanga

¶3

======================================================

¶4

PAWAN KUMAR SAHU, Son of Late Vijay Kumar Sahu, Resident of Village - Aashi, P.S. - Ghanshyampur, District - Darbhanga.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vinay Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pranav Kumar, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 15-06-2020 The matter has been taken up through Video Conferencing.

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶13

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

Allegation against the petitioner is of kidnapping of

¶15

the daughter of the informant. The victim girl, in her statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C., has stated that she had voluntarily gone with the petitioner as her husband used to assault her off and on.

¶16

Since the victim has not alleged anything against the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1978 of 2020(3) dt.15-06-2020 2/2

¶18

period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Ghanshyampur Police Station Case No. 167 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as subject to the following conditions:-

¶19

(a) The petitioner shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

¶20

(b) Both the bailors shall be resident of the territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below.

¶21

¶22

(Birendra Kumar, J)

¶23

Kundan/-

¶24

U T

Pawan Kumar Sahu v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pawan Kumar Sahu v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kamla Kant Tiwari @ Kamal Kant Tiwari Vs The State of Bihar

Dharmendra Kumar @ Sukhi Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Deepak Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Shahrukh @ Shahrukh Khan Vs The State of Bihar

Harendra Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Firoz Alam Vs The State of Bihar